Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Rachael Samantha Bose, Soumya Simon
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.59892
Certificate: View Certificate
This paper examines the intricate relationship between study habits and academic performance among university students. Drawing upon a synthesis of empirical studies, theoretical frameworks, and psychological models, the abstract delves into the multifaceted dynamics shaping students\\\' study habits and their consequent impact on academic achievement. Key factors such as time management, learning strategies, motivation, self-regulation, and environmental influences are explored within the context of diverse student populations and academic disciplines. Moreover, the abstract elucidates the reciprocal nature of this relationship, wherein effective study habits not only enhance academic performance but also contribute to holistic student development. Additionally, it sheds light on the role of technology, social media, and other contemporary influences in shaping modern study habits and their implications for academic success. Finally, the abstract underscores the importance of tailored interventions and educational strategies aimed at optimizing study habits to foster optimal academic outcomes and lifelong learning skills among university students.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the ever-evolving landscape of Indian society, education stands as a gateway to opportunity for today's youth. With the belief that knowledge is the key to unlocking numerous avenues, the educational sphere demands a diverse array of skills, strategies, and techniques from students to excel academically. At the heart of this journey lie the study habits deeply ingrained in students' daily routines, serving as essential catalysts for effective engagement with their studies without succumbing to undue stress. Widely acknowledged as pivotal determinants of academic performance (Jafari, 2019), these study habits encompass the habitual tendencies and practices exhibited by students during their learning endeavors (Kumar, 2015). From adept time management to precise goal setting, from selecting conducive study environments to employing effective note-taking strategies, these habits have been honed by countless students with the aim of enhancing study efficiency and nurturing creativity, thereby ensuring sustained immersion in the learning process.
Simultaneously, academic performance emerges as a crucial benchmark for evaluating students' achievements, grades, and overall progress across different subjects. It mirrors the quality of learning experiences within the Indian educational landscape, particularly in higher education institutions (Magulod, 2019). Studies conducted by Siahi and Maiyo (2015), Chilca (2017), and Ebele and Olufu (2017) have underscored a significant positive correlation between study habits and academic achievements. However, findings by Jafari (2019) suggest a moderate positive correlation between medical students' study habits and academic performance, hinting at the need for targeted training to enhance study habits and academic outcomes. Despite these insights, a research gap persists within the Indian context, with existing studies predominantly yielding similar affirmative conclusions. Hence, the present study aims to evaluate the study habits and academic performance of senior high school students in India, contributing to their preparedness for higher education. It endeavors to identify potential challenges encountered by students in their study routines and offer comprehensive solutions for students, educators, parents, counselors, and future researchers.
II. MATERIAL AND METHODS
A. Research Design
This study adopts a quantitative approach as its primary method, involving the collection and analysis of numerical data to draw statistical conclusions and identify patterns systematically.
The chosen methodology is a correlational approach, investigating the relationship between university students' academic performance and their study habits without manipulating variables. Through this method, the aim is to understand the nature and extent of the association between classroom anxiety and academic achievement.
Data collection will utilize surveys, tests, or similar instruments to quantify study habits and academic performance indicators among participant students. Statistical techniques like correlation coefficients will be employed to determine the strength and direction of observed associations. A positive correlation implies that as classroom anxiety increases, academic performance also increases, while a negative correlation suggests the opposite trend.
The quantitative approach and correlational research design offer several advantages, including precise data collection, rigorous statistical analysis, and enhanced generalizability of findings due to a large sample size.
B. Operational Definitions
Study Habits: Consistent learning behaviors encompassing various approaches such as time management, note-taking, concentration, and exam preparation.
Academic Performance: Achievement and accomplishments in educational settings, assessed through grades, test scores, coursework completion, participation, and teacher evaluations.
C. Research Question
How do study habits influence academic performance among young adults aged 18 to 25?
D. Objectives
Investigate the relationship between study habits and academic performance.
Compare study habits between high and low achievers.
Assess differences in study habits between genders.
E. Hypothesis
H01: There is no significant relationship between study habits and academic performance.
H02: There is no significant difference in study habits between high and low achievers.
H03: There is no significant difference in study habits between males and females.
F. Participants
Convenience sampling method; 100 males and 100 females aged 18 to 25. Inclusion criteria include educational pursuit, ability to read/write English, and informed consent.
G. Tests Used
Study Habits Inventory: Palsane and Sharma Study Habit Inventory (PSSHI) to assess study habits.
Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) to measure academic performance.
H. Procedure
Recruitment of participants aged 18-25, data collection via Google Forms questionnaire, followed by statistical analysis using Pearson correlation and independent sample t-test.
I. Ethical Considerations
Adherence to APA ethics guidelines, including institutional approval, informed consent, confidentiality, and transparency.
J. Statistical Techniques
Utilization of SPSS (Version 25) for statistical analysis, including Pearson correlation for examining associations.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The purpose of the study was to analyze the relationship between Study Habits and Academic Performance among University Students. The data was collected using Palsane and Sharma’s Study Habits Inventory (PSSHI) and the Academic Performance of the previous semester. The sample size consisted of 200 University Students aged 18 – 25 years residing in India at the time of the study being done, were selected. The data was entered into Microsoft Excel and then exported into SPSS 25 for statistical analysis.
Table 4.1 (a) Socio-demographic details of the participants
|
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Age |
18 -25years |
200 |
100 |
Sex |
Males |
100 |
50 |
|
Females |
100 |
50 |
|
Under Graduation |
135 |
67.5 |
Current Education Level |
Post Graduation |
57 |
28.5 |
|
Ph.D. and others |
8 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Data presented in Table 4.1 shows that 200 respondents representing 100% are within the age group of 18 – 25 years, while 135 respondents representing 67.5 % are from the undergraduate level, 57 respondents representing 28.5 % are from the postgraduate level, and only small percentage of 8 representing 4% from the PhD and other group category.
Ho1: There is no significant relationship between Study Habits and Academic Performance among University students.
Table 4.2: Correlation between Study Habits and Academic Performance among University students.
N |
M |
SD |
r |
p |
|
Study Habits |
200 |
48.35 |
5.237 |
.004** |
.951 |
Academic Performance |
70.55 |
4.051 |
Note: **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The Pearson Correlation test presented in Table 1 indicates the relationship between Study Habits and Academic Performance among University Students. The r value was found to be .004, (p>=0.01) and shows a very weak positive correlation that is not statistically significant, which indicates that the Null Hypothesis is accepted, meaning there is no significant relationship between Study Habits and Academic Performance among University Students.
H02: There is no significant difference in the study habits between Under Achievers and Over Achievers.
Table 4.3: Independent sample t-test Study Habits between Over Achievers and Under Achievers at the University level.
Study Habits |
N |
M |
SD |
SE |
t |
df |
p |
Under Achievers |
20 |
58.15 |
12.799 |
2.862 |
1.263 |
178 |
.657 |
Over Achievers |
160 |
54.70 |
11.359 |
.898 |
Note: SD= Standard Deviation; SE=Standard Error.
The Independent Sample t-test presented in Table 2 indicates the level of Classroom Anxiety among underachievers and overachievers. The Mean score was found to be 58.15 for Under Achievers and 54.70 for Over Achievers (p>0.05). There was a difference of mean in favor of the Under Achievers which indicates that their Study Habits was higher than the Over Achievers. The Standard Deviation obtained by Under Achievers was found to be 12.799 and for Over Achievers it was found to be 11.359 suggesting that the scores of the Under Achievers were spread more away from the mean scores than that of the Over Achievers. To test the obtained mean difference of their statistical significance, the scores were subjected to an Independent Sample t-test, and the value of t was found to be 1.263. There was no significant difference found in the level of Study Habits among Under Achievers and Over Achievers. Therefore, the Null Hypothesis is accepted.
H03: There is no significant difference in the study habits between males and females.
Table 4.4: Independent sample t-test of Study Habits between Males and Females.
Study Habits |
N |
M |
SD |
SE |
t |
df |
p |
Males |
100 |
47.87 |
4.271 |
0.835 |
1.298 |
238.168 |
.01 |
Females |
100 |
48.83 |
6.035 |
1.088 |
Note: SD= Standard Deviation; SE=Standard Error.
The Independent Sample t-test presented in Table 3 indicates the Study Habits among Male and Female University Students. The Mean score was found to be 47.87 for Males and 48.83 for Females (p=0.01). There was a minimal difference in mean in favor of Females which indicates that their Study habits was higher than Males. The Standard Deviation obtained by Males was found to be 4.271 and for Females it was found to be 6.035 suggesting that the scores of the Females were spread more away from the mean scores than that of the Males. To test the obtained mean difference of their statistical significance, the scores were subjected to an Independent Sample t-test and the value of t was found to be 0.086. There was a significant difference found in the level of Study Habits among Males and Females. Therefore, the Null Hypothesis is rejected.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I extend my heartfelt appreciation to everyone who contributed to this research endeavor. The unwavering support and encouragement bestowed upon me have been invaluable in successfully completing this paper.
I sincerely express my profound gratitude to Ms. Soumya Simon, my esteemed research guide and assistant professor. Your guidance has been instrumental throughout this journey. I am deeply thankful for your patience, motivation, and boundless expertise. Your continuous support, along with your genuine and inspirational assistance, has been a beacon of light. I am grateful for the wealth of knowledge, experiences, and encouraging remarks you shared, which have greatly enriched this research.
Furthermore, I am indebted to the Department of Psychology at Kristu Jayanti College for providing me with the invaluable opportunity to pursue and advance my research. I extend my sincere appreciation to my beloved family and friends for their unwavering love, support, and assistance. Their insightful advice and recommendations have been invaluable in navigating the various stages of this research. I am profoundly grateful for their noble support in allowing me to pursue my aspirations and explore new paths in life. Lastly, I offer my deepest gratitude to the divine for guiding me through the challenges encountered along this journey. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews (WJARR) for providing a platform for disseminating research findings. We appreciate the editorial team's support and professionalism throughout the publication process.
A. Conflict of Interest
Conflict of Interest Statement:
Rachael Samantha Bose: The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Soumya Simon: The author declares no conflicts of interest.
B. Ethical Approval
The researcher adhered to the 2016 APA ethics guidelines throughout the study, specifically following point 8 regarding ethical considerations:
The study aimed to investigate the correlation between study habits and academic performance among university students, as well as differences in study habits among overachievers and underachievers, and between males and females. The hypothesis suggested no significant correlation between study habits and academic performance, no significant difference in study habits between overachievers and underachievers, and no significant difference in study habits between males and females. However, the results revealed a very weak negative correlation between study habits and academic performance, which was statistically insignificant, indicating no significant negative correlation between the two variables. Similarly, no significant difference was found in study habits between overachievers and underachievers. Contrarily, a significant difference was observed in study habits between males and females. This finding suggests that factors beyond traditional study habits may influence academic performance, such as effective study techniques utilized outside the classroom, external support systems, individual strengths, resilience, or differing responses to pressure. Overall, these findings underscore the complexity of factors influencing academic performance and highlight the need for further research to better understand and address these dynamics. Understanding the nuances of study habits and their impact on academic outcomes can inform educational interventions and support systems aimed at enhancing student success.
[1] Segal R, Blerta Shtylla, Sindi S. Using Mathematics to Understand Biological Complexity. Springer Nature; 2020. [2] IJIP.In. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, Volume 3, Issue 4, No. 68. RED’SHINE Publication. Inc; 2016. [3] Santi KL, Reed DK, Springerlink (Online Service. Improving Reading Comprehension of Middle and High School Students. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. [4] Akporehwe J.N. and Onwioduokit, F.A. Enhancing scientific attitude through activity-based approaches. Nigerian Journal of Science and Science Education (NJSSE). 2010;2(8):87-101. [5] Aremu, A.O. & Sokan, B.O. Multi casual evaluation of the academic performance of Nigerian learners: Issues and implications for National Development. An unpublished paper. 2002. [6] Aremu, C. Study Habits and Student’s Academic Performance in English in Secondary Schools in Cross Rivers State. Unpublished MSc. Dissertation. University of Calabar. 2001. [7] Bakare, C.G.M. Study hall Habits Inventory (SHI), Ibadan Education Research Production Psychology. 2009. [8] Baquiran, D. Effective Study Habits and Students Academic Achievement in South-Central of Cross Rivers State. Unpublished MSc. Dissertation.University of Calabar. 2011. [9] Berenson, S.B; Carter, G.; & Norwood, K.S. The at-risk student in College Developmental Algebra. School Science and Mathematics. 1992;92(2):55-58. [10] Biegel, S. The interfaces between attendance, academic achievement, and equal educational opportunity. The Report of consent decree monitoring team. U.S District Court, Northern District of California. 2010. [11] Charles-Ogan, G.& Alamina, J. Students’ study habit and performance in public and private secondary schools Mathematics in Port Harcourt Local Government Area, Rivers State. Journal of International Academic Research of Multidisciplinary. 2014;2(7):258-265. [12] Chukwu, B. Academic Performance of Secondary School Students in Mathematics. Nsuka: Afro-or bis publishing. 2008. [13] Chung, C.J. Impact of attendance, instructor contact, and homework completion on achievement in a developmental logic course. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles. On 27/11/2005. 2004. [14] Nuthana, P. & Yenagi, G. Influence of study habits self-concept on academic achievement of boys and girls. Kartanaka Journal of Agricultural Science. 2009;22(5):1135-1138. [15] Ojoko, S., & Koko, M. Correlates of study skills and academic performance of secretarial studies student teachers of Rivers State University of Science and Technology. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 1994;20(2). [16] Okon, U. The Factors that Influence Students Understanding of Mathematics. Calabar: Rapid Educational Publishers. 2005. [17] Okobiah, O. C. & Okorodudu, R. I. Concepts of guidance and counseling in Okobiah, O. C. & Okorodudu, R. I. (eds.). Issues concepts, theories and techniques of guidance and counselling. Benin-City: Ethiope publishers, 24–54. 2006. [18] Olasehinde FAO. Cheating in Examinations in the University of Ilorin: styles, causes and Remedies. Nigerian Journal of Educational Foundations. 2004;4(1):42–53. [19] Oluwatimilehin, J.T.B., & Owoyele, J.W. Study habits & academic achievement in core subjects among junior secondary school students in Ondo state, Nigeria. Bulgarian Journal of Science & Education Policy (BJSEP). 2012;6(1):155–169. Retrieved from http://bjsep.org/getfile.php?id=112 [20] O’Neale and Harrison. An investigation of the learning styles and study habits of chemistry undergraduates in Barbados and their effects as predictors of academic achievement in chemical group theory. Journal of Education and Social Research. 2013;3(2). Retrieved from http://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/download/148/141 [21] Onu, C. A Handbook on Guidance and Counselling. Nsukka: University of Nsukka. 2016. [22] Onwuegbuzie, A. J. Library anxiety and characteristic strengths and weakness of graduate students’ study habits. Library Review. 2001;50(2):73–80. [23] Osa, A. The Secret of Note-taking. Port Harcourt: Double Publications. 2012. [24] Osa-Edoh, G. & Alutu, A. A survey of students\\\' study habits in selected secondary schools: Implications for counseling. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences. 2012;4(3):228–234. ISSN 2041-3246. [25] Ossai M.C. Age and gender differences in study habits: A framework for proactive counseling against low academic achievement. Journal of Education and Social Research. 2012;2(3):67–73. [26] Pascopella, A. (2012). The dropout crisis: Educators sound off on the pros and cons of the National Education Association’s 12-step plan to reduce dropouts. District Administration. Retrieved from http://www.districtadministration.com [27] Philippou, N. G., & Christou, C. (1998). The Effects of a Preparatory Mathematics Program in Changing Prospective Teachers’ Attitudes towards Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 189-206. [28] Poiani, E.L. (2002). Does developmental Mathematics work? Retrieved from http://www.maa.org/sann/maanoles4a/202.html. [29] Rana, S. & Kausar, R. (2011). Comparison of study habits and academic performance of Pakistan British and White British students. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 9, 21-26. Retrieved from http://www.gcu.edu.pk/FullTextJour/PJSCS/2011/4.pdf [30] Riaz, A., Asma, K., & Niaz, H. N. (2002). Relationship of study habits with educational achievements. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4(3), 369-371. [31] Salami, C.G.E. (2013). Gender academic achievement in Delta State University, Asaba. Universal Journal of Education and General Studies, 2(3), 118-126. [32] Sorenson, H. P. (1991). Psychology in Education. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. [33] Stanca, L. (2014). The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel data evidence from introductory microeconomics, forthcoming. Journal of Economic Education, pp. 56-63. [34] Talib, N. (2012). Determinants of academic performance of university students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 27(2), 265-278. Retrieved from http://www.piprnip.edu.pk/pjpr/index.php/pjpr/article/download/198/168 [35] Tanriogen, A., & Iscan, S. (2009). Time management skills of Pamukkale University students and their effects on academic achievement. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 35, 93-108. [36] Urban-Lurain, M., & Weinbank, D. J. (2000). Attendance and outcome in a large collaborative learning performance assessment course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AEIRA). [37] VanBlerkon, M. L. (1992). Class Attendance in undergraduate courses. The Journal of Psychology, 126(5), 487-494. [38] Wade, S. E., Trathen, W., & Schraw, G. (1990). Spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 147-166. Retrieved from http://www.ccsenet.org/../23667 [39] Williams, E., & Media, D. (2013). What is the meaning of Academic Performance? Retrieved on 29th May, 2016 from http://work.chron.com/meaning-academic-performance-17332.html.
Copyright © 2024 Rachael Samantha Bose, Soumya Simon. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET59892
Publish Date : 2024-04-06
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here